Posts Tagged ‘School Bus Driver’

Another School Bus Driver Charged with Drunken Driving

November 4, 2010

Dinah Lynn Patterson McGlothlin drunk school bus driver

By my calculation,  63-year-old Knox County school bus driver, Dinah Lynn Patterson McGlothlin, charged Tuesday morning with drunken driving is the latest in a long string of school bus drivers charged with impaired driving already for this school year.  We have documented at least nine (9) incidents already and we are only in the third month of the school year!

Dinah Lynn Patterson McGlothlin was charged after a crash at a traffic light where a box truck was stopped, said Knoxville Police Department spokesman Darrell DeBusk.

Officers charged McGlothlin with drunken driving and reckless driving. DeBusk said McGlothlin submitted to a field sobriety test and then was taken to the University of Tennessee Medical Center for a blood test.

McGlothlin was driving bus 360 at the time of the 6:26 a.m. crash. She was en route to begin picking up preschool children for Cedar Bluff Elementary School. She also transports special education children for Hardin Valley Academy, DeBusk said.

Witnesses told police the bus, which has a capacity of about 20 students, had driven up on the curb of the road and nearly struck another vehicle at least twice before the impact.

The bus slammed into a food-delivery box truck stopped at the end of the ramp from Interstate 40 East to Cedar Bluff Road, authorities said. No one was injured in the crash, DeBusk said. Both vehicles were driven from the scene. The box truck was driven by Steven Hodges, 40, of Sevierville, DeBusk said. Hodges was driving for Five Star Foods in Alcoa.

DeBusk said there was no evidence of alcohol on the bus. “She had some items in her pockets, but we’re not sure if that’s what led to her condition,” he said.  DeBusk said it appears the driver was impaired by pills and alcohol.

Are you as scared for our kids as I am?

Advertisements

Drunk School Bus Driver Sends 13 Children to the Hospital

October 15, 2010

After reading about police officers, paramedics, doctors and even coroners driving drunk, is anyone surprised that we also have school bus drivers being arrested for DUI with children on their bus?   Last week an Illinois District 150 bus driver was arrested for allegedly driving while under the influence when he crashed into two parked cars and sent 13 children to two Peoria hospitals.  Thankfully all were released later that day.

According to police, Stewart registered a 0.04 percent on a breath test, however the required by law blood draw results are not yet available.  Stewart admitted drinking three beers, some 12 hours before the crash, and taking some cold medicine later that night.  He said he was not impaired, noting he took students from Peoria to Pekin that morning before the accident.  I guess he thinks that just because he didn’t crash on his first route of the day, we should believe that he couldn’t have possibly been impaired, right?  Wrong!

Just because someone has gotten away with doing something before and nothing bad happened doesn’t mean they weren’t wrong.  It just means they didn’t get caught!  Unfortunately, he isn’t the only one who thinks that way.  Too many school districts and business feel that just because they haven’t had an incident where an employee has been caught driving under the influence while on the job, means it isn’t happening.  They too are wrong.  Statistically,  it just means they haven’t been caught,  yet.

Given that 10% of the American population is considered to be an addict, the odds are stacked against any school district or company.  Lets face it, if you have 10 or more drivers, chances are, you have at least one that is driving your company vehicle under the influence on a regular basis.

It used to be that there really wasn’t anything a company could do to protect themselves 24/7, but not anymore.  So, you can either bury your head in the sand and continue to play the odds, or you can do something to protect your company.  It will cost you either way, but one is MUCH more expensive than the other.

Just remember . . .

Impaired Worker + Company Vehicle = $$$$$$$$$